Apple’s iPhone Mis-step

I saw this article today about AT&T trying to make the iPhone more attractive to business users through a plan. Unfortunately, this battle was lost even before the iPhone came out. And there were easy ways to win it. It just goes to show you that even the greatest companies such as Apple sometimes become so focused they become myopic. They just didn’t see the forest for the trees on this one.

The only way the iPhone is going to see widespread adoption in the enterprise is if it has an enterprise-caliber email interface. Not coincidentally, this is the only thing keeping the Apple from selling millions more iPhones to professionals. I have handled an iPhone extensively, and have concluded that I could adapt to the on-screen keyboard in exchange for all the other wonderful things an iPhone can do. All it needs is a robust email and calendar offering.

A few years ago I used a great email application by Good Technology. GoodMail had a great interface, great functionality, excellent calendar, and was really easy on the battery. In fact, it was so good, Motorola scooped them up last summer… for a lousy $75 million.

Apple, sitting on $15 billion in cash, could get busy solving this problem anytime they were ready, but that is not happening. And until it does, no plan from AT&T is going to woo enterprise buyers.

Disclosure: As of publication I have no positions in the stocks mentioned here. I am not a professional, but I am trying this at home. It is highly recommended that you consult a licensed financial advisor or broker before making any and all investment decisions.

Dow 15,000: It Will Be Here Sooner Than You Think

I know. I write stuff like this and I get accused of (yes, rampant) drug use. Ironically, I am one of the few people I know who can honestly say that I’ve never indulged.

So right after I pen some craziness, I always say the same thing: Hear me out.

A recent Merrill Lynch report is calling for a 15% drop in housing prices in the coming year. The fed cut this week and will cut again next week. What does all this mean? Simply, that real estate, bonds, and interest bearing accounts will be lousy investments this coming year.

There is a theory (one I subscribe to) that the stock market would have been much higher over the last few years except that housing and commodities were too hot of an investment… so housing and commodities was where the money flows went.

With cooling (not freezing, cooling) housing, cooling jobs, both housing and commodities are beginning to move downward. Certainly, there will not be big returns to be had in either in 2008. So money will be moving to where money can be made: stocks.

Stock valuations are still historically low. We could easily move to 15,000 and still have reasonable market P/E, and stock-price-to-corporate cash valuations that are well within historical ranges. Further, valuations combined with lower interest rates will continue to drive M&A.

So the Dow will easily get to 15,000 by year’s end.

“But what about the economy?” What about it? The stock market and the economy are not the same thing, sometimes they move in lock step, and sometimes they don’t. Remember in 03 and 04 when we had our ‘jobless recovery’? Markets did great and the economy did only pretty good. Look for that again this year.

So what to buy? Right now: Money Center Banks and Brokerages. For two reasons: First, they have been crushed, and the worst is over. These stocks will move up in anticipation of improving valuations, and once valuations improve (think 3Q) the stocks will go up some more. Second, it’s volatile times like these that drive scared, stressed, confused investors into the waiting arms of their broker. Expect record earnings from that part of the business.

Speaking of housing, one pet peeve: Falling housing prices are the headline of the day, and every person I talk to is concerned about it. And I always say the same thing: Are you selling your house this year? No? Then what the hell do you care? This doesn’t affect you.” Stay diversified, even if it’s just a 401k. There will be money to be made in stocks this year and money will be made in housing another year. Over time, everything goes up in value, so relax… and unless you just want to be depressed, turn off the 24 hour depression machine known as cable news.

PS. There will be a ton of volatility in the market between now and election day. Then a 10% move up if a Republican is elected and a smaller, muted move if a Democrat is elected (markets like gridlock and the Dems will continue to hold both chambers of Congress).

Disclosure: As of publication, I am long MER, though positions are subject to change at any moment. I am not a professional, but I am trying this at home. It is highly recommended that you consult a licensed financial advisor or broker before making any and all investment decisions.

Why I am long Mastercard and short Amazon

Yeah. In a pose a yoga master would envy. A contortion that would kick any mere mortal’s ass in a game of Twister… I am long Mastercard and short Amazon. What’s more, if they do the opposite of what I think in the short term, I will just double down.

Before you begin calling for the straight jackets and the sedatives, let me remind you that it’s not a weekend where I can sleep off this type of horseplay (besides, everyone knows I am strictly OTC with good Cabernet). Seriously, hear me out.

OK… Mastercard is driven by retail and so it Amazon. So they should move nearly in lock step right? Sort of. They did for the last year. But a major divergence is coming.

Why long Mastercard? In the wake of the bad numbers last week from American Express, Mastercard sold off 11% in sympathy. The reason: Amex cited increasing deliquencies, which does not impact Mastercard, but also cited decreased card usage. The alledged experts devined that this would affect Mastercard, whose model is obtaining a percentage of every transaction charged to a card that carries its logo. Less card usage means less revenue for Mastercard, right?

But wait. There are two substantial differences between Amex and Mastercard. First, despite alot of diversification into revolving credit cards (cards you can pay off over time) a good number of Amex cards are still demand cards (cards you pay off in full when you get the statement). When households become concerned about their “finances,” what they are really concerned about is cash flow… having enough money to pay the bills that must be paid in full each month (like electricity and mortgage and car) and enough left over to at least manage the debt on their credit cards (pay the minimum payment or a little more). During times like this, consumers who normally charge on a demand card like Amex (usually to collect the rewards points) will switch to a revolving charge card so that they can better manage their cash flow.

Another difference that is even more important: Mastercard has a huge presence in debit cards. And just because people stop using their Mastercard or Amex credit card will not stop them using their debit cards. To be sure, more than 80% of gasoline purchases are done at the pump using a credit or debit card. And Mastercard gets a piece of each transaction. If you believe in the long term that gasoline prices will increase, then you can feel comfortable buying into Mastercard’s model.

Amazon, like Mastercard, plays heavily in the retail space. And last year while the consumer was humming along both stocks ran up drastically. But the similarities end there. Amazon had strong sales last year, but the sales were centered heavily on one-time events (e.g., the release of the last Harry Potter book). The vast majority of these customers will never be long-term profitable. And there is no such revenue-driving event coming this year.

All good reasons to be supect. But the reality check for me came when I saw that Amazon’s P/E was an unbelievable 95. By contrast, Google–the standard bearer for making money on the net– trades at a significantly more modest P/E of 50.  Amazon is priced for perfection. And when they fail to attain it, the stock will get crushed.

Disclosure: As of publication, I am long MA and short AMZN, though positions are subject to change at any moment. I am not a professional, but I am trying this at home. It is highly recommended that you consult a licensed financial advisor or broker before making any and all investment decisions.

A Solution Looking For A Problem To Solve

For all of you entrepreneur and investing types out there, this is a perfect example of a solution looking for a problem to solve. Can you believe a VC just spotted these guys 13 million bucks for this? Who in the world would ever use this? Not even me, a guy who used these very pages to write a nastygram about exactly how much I hate spam in my snail mailbox.

Getting Back Into The Market

I finally got back in the market today. The panic selling in Countrywide is silly overdone. The uptick in delinquencies will be really short lived, and the notion of bankruptcy here is a spook story. And if additional capital is needed, do you really think Bank Of America wouldn’t use this opportunity to double down on their investment in Countrywide? Or that any other cash-rich major would hesitate? This may have finally hit bottom.

The Merrill Shares I have are upside down, but after today not as badly as before. But the best news is that Merrill’s stock held at the levels the overseas investors got in their pricing. When the overseas money came into Merrill last month, the investors received the right to purchase the stock at $48. The stock got as low as $47.50 and then bounced higher. Take this in contrast to BofA’s right to buy Countrywide at $18, and how Countrywide plummeted through that floor. If you owned Countrywide above $18, this was an obvious signal to sell and wait for another opportunity. Likewise, an investor in Merrill can use $47.50 as a bottom, and that any meaningful move below this level as a sign to sell and reset. So now that you can see the downside, we all know that the upside is huge. It’s going to take some time, but I am staying in… that is, so long as it holds above the floor. Expect more volatility around their earnings announcement next week, and then things to calm down, and a nice slow steady progression upward.

I jumped into AAPL today, but my stay was brief. It went up $5 in the hour after I bought in, so I took it off the table and will reset tomorrow. It has just been so volatile in the mornings I just didn’t want to hold it. It wasn’t hard to convince myself to take the fast buck.

If you’re like so many I know who are looking at Citi, anytime now is a good time to get in, doubly so if your horizon is longer than 12 months. Goldman looks good at these levels, but like AAPL it is really volatile. So does YRCW, and Bear Stearns… I mean, exactly how much more carnage can their be in these names?

Disclosure: As of publication, I am long MER and CFC, though positions are subject to change at any moment. I am not a professional, but I am trying this at home. It is highly recommended that you consult a licensed financial advisor or broker before making any and all investment decisions.

The Results of My Predictions: The First Three Months

So there is no point to writing this thing without taking a stand and saying what I think will happen. Below are some predictions I made in my first few months at this. Of the 9 predictions I made, 5 were correct, and two are looking good but not quite home yet. Not a bad start. 

Interest rate cut in November: I was wrong. They cut.

Oil over $100: Right and wrong. I said if November rate cut happens, oil would be over $100 a barrel within a week. I was wrong, but close… it got into the high $98 range before falling off. NOTE: On January 2, it got over $100 for the first time, which was well within the range I initially predicted.

Virtualization slowing hardware sales: So far, correct. The first real salvo is a downgrade for Red Hat. From Barron’s online on Dec 10:

Red Hat (RHT) shares are lower this morning after Jefferies & Co.’s Katherine Egbert cut her rating on the stock to Hold from Buy, trimming her price target ot $19 from $23. Her primary issue with the stock: the impact server virtualization has on Linux demand.

“In ongoing attempts to reduce the cost of maintaining their compute infrastructures, many companies have looked in recent years to the cost savings offered migrating legacy Unix systems to lower cost Linux servers,” she explains. “However, there is now a greater opportunity to reduce costs via virtualization, as technology from VMware (VMW) allows Unix and Unix apps to be run in a virtualized container on existing hardware, even alongside Windows. This direct-to-virtualization solution negates the need for new Lintel hardware to support legacy systems. New servers are also increasingly shipped with Windows + VMware, further robbing Linux of market share at the OEM level.”

Meanwhile, Egbert adds that to diversify away from its core Linux business, Red Hat has purchased other open source software companies; she thinks it is likely Red Hat will make further acquisitions, “potentially limited gross margin and operating margin expansion.”

The worst is over for Merrill Lynch: So far, so good. The stock dipped briefly, went up briefly, and has now dipped. But eve with the capital infusion, the threat of an imminent 10% workforce reduction, and the need to write down billions more and infuse billions more, the stock has leveled off. Perhaps it has found a bottom in the low 50’s.

The race for the Democratic Nomination would tighten: Correct. Yes, this probably would have happened to some degree anyway, but Obama went from 30 points down in Iowa to having a lead, and Hillary faded completely in New Hampshire in the wake of what I called Hillary’s “Howard Dean Moment.” Caucuses are coming soon.

The award to the RIAA for the music file sharing suit would not hold up: The lawyers for the woman asked the court to reduce the award from $222,000 to $150. This is getting very serious consideration. We’ll see…

Starbucks does not have room to grow: Correct. On Dec 11, Goldman Sachs agreed with me and downgraded the stock, saying: “Goldman Sachs analyst Steven Kron cut his rating on Starbucks Corp. to neutral from buy, and removed the coffee-shop operator from its Americas buy list. In a note to clients, Kron cited underperformance including slower same-store sales, declining new store productivity, margin erosion, stock weakness and concerns over competition and saturation.” {Bolding mine}

Apple Adobe and Best Buy strong into year’s end: All true. All were up going into the final days of the year, including a foray over $200 for Apple.

Disclosure: As of publication, I am long MER, though positions are subject to change at any moment. I am not a professional, but I am trying this at home. It is highly recommended that you consult a licensed financial advisor or broker before making any and all investment decisions.